Costing on average twice that of Normal Type I cassette tapes are High Bias Type II cassette tapes the most cost effective upgrade for the budget conscious audiophile?
By: Ringo Bones
During the 1980s – and in fact well into the 1990s and the
first decade of the year 2000 – audiophiles who still use cassette tapes in
compiling their own “mix tapes” for personal listening via Walkman or car
stereo will probably gravitate towards TDK’s Super Avilyn cobalt-doped series
of high bias Type II cassette tapes despite that on average these costs twice
as much as Normal or Type I cassette tapes. But is the improvement in sound
quality really worth the cost?
In my actual experience on the matter, CD players were still
a relative rarity in the 1990s and no CD potable – then and now – even approaches
the sound quality capability of the famed Marantz CD 63 SE Ken Ishiwata
Signature. But inexplicably, if you are lucky enough to own or have access to a
good sounding CD player and an excellent audiophile tape deck, like a Marantz
CD 63 SE connected to those Technics “Thin Film Tape Head” series of cassette
decks, recording your CDs onto a TDK Super Avilyn blank cassette even without
resorting to speed doubling could make your still functional 1980s era Sony
Walkman sounds as good as a Marantz CD 63 CD player.
To me at least, my primary raison d’être for using high bias
tapes over normal tapes is that not only that high bias tapes like TDK SA can
record better high frequencies in comparison to normal cassette tapes but also
of their low noise or tape hiss. Walkmans and car stereos are usually equipped
with Type II High Bias 70 μ second / Type I 120 μ second switch. Switching the
setting to Type II 70 μ second usually results in a noise reduction that’s better
than Dolby B without the dulling effect of low cost cassette playback equipment with a not optimally set Dolby B noise reduction system . And I bet others' preference of other high bias tapes than the
TDK SA over normal Type I tapes may be largely due to tape hiss issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment